
Hamas “Regrets” That Ethics In Modern Warfare Was Not Debated In UNSC.
Charles Arthur-The new York Times
On the agenda for the Security Council during this summit was a discussion of ethics in modern warfare. With recent trends towards asymmetric warfare, tactical decisions by militaries and insurgent groups have drifted away from ethical guidelines set forth by the Geneva Convention. The presence of the United States, Israel, Egypt, and the United Kingdom, all countries that have been implicated in supposed “unethical practices” in the “war on terrorism” such as rendition, assassination, and “enhanced interrogation” would assuredly have had to engage in a complex debate on this issue.
When asked by The New York Times if the issue should have been addressed the delegate from Egypt to the UNSC is quoted as saying “I think the issues at hand are more urgent”, and “the topic of ethics in warfare is a complex and philosophical issue”. In a rare difference of opinion the representative from Hamas, an organization which has often accused Israel and the United States of human rights violations in warfare was asked the same question and expressed “regret” that the issue will not be raised in this summit.
When asked if ethical considerations have changed in the context of the “war on terrorism”, the United Kingdom’s representative to the Security Council responded by saying that “the United Kingdom must do anything possible to protect its citizens from terrorists”, and in response to the Hamas quote “We will consider discussing this with Hamas when they stop using human shields, and suicide bombers”.
Ethics in Modern war is clearly a contested issue that has changed in the eyes of nations as war itself has changed, and will certainly appear on the agenda in future UN summits.